9th Annual International Conference on Ethics in Biology, Engineering & Medicine

What a wonderful opportunity to be at the 9th International Conference on Ethics in Biology, Engineering & Medicine since I was travelling to Florida for RFID2018. I have been trying to get to this conference for a number of years without success. Professor Subrata Saha began the conference series, and this year the host university was Florida International University. FIU's main campus is situated in Miami and this year the conference chairs were Subrata Saha and Zachary Danziger.

Keynote: Jonathan Moreno University of Pennsylvania

There are some people who can entertain and inform all in the same breath! Professor Jonathan Moreno is one of those people. A self-confessed historian of science rather than ethicist, Moreno breaks down decades of research in minutes with his knowledge of history, science and technology, and national security. He officially holds the David and Lyn Silfen University Professor Of Ethics and is a professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy.

The following notes are from Jonathan Moreno's talks. I took the notes as accurately as possible but surely I have made errors on occasion of transcription, sentiment or context. For this I take full responsibility. But I managed to capture some of the audio of the presentation. Of the greatest value I received, is a reassurance that my own research in this space is richer for its multidisciplinarity, and while some may not see its relevance yet, the time is fast approaching (almost here now), where we will become preoccupied by ethics first and foremost in the development process of any kind of scientific or technological endeavour.

Mind Wars
Jonathan D. Moreno

Mind Wars – Jonathan D. Moreno

Brain science and the military in the 21st century

  • National security and the brain before neuroscience
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Non-invasive imaging
  • Brain-machine interface
  • International law
  • Ethics

"The Silence of the Neuroengineers", Nature, 2004

  • Nasty attack on DARPA
  • Given up moral standing—what will be done with your work
  • Cheap shot at DARPA—figuring out to get prosthetic arms
  • Dual use and multiuse
  • Decide what purposes these devices should be put toward
  • Multiuse not just single purpose (consider importance of prosthetics)

The Era of “Big Neuroscience”

  • Simulate the human brain
  • Map activity of neurons

The Human Brain Project (Henry Markman—simulate human brain)

  • We’ll believe that when we see it!

Brain Initiative

  • Concerned about PTSD, TBI (traumatic brain injury) and dementia in general
    • Growth of FMRI
    • Imaging
    • Dozens of labs and postdocs, grants, publications

In Pharma world there is not a whole lot that people have to offer for these medical illnesses

Diagnostic based approach (DSM) or neuroscience-based?

  • Epistemological debate
  •   Not much in pipeline (severe depression, schizophrenia) with standard drugs
  •  Pharma buy up small companies that specialise in one or two drugs

PENN Research

  • Centre for Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience bootcamp—teach about the brain
  • Growth in publication in 1990s was explosive and now continues
  • Corporate room—law—dalga test for scientific evidence

Cognitive Neuroscience Funding (US Defense, 2011)

  • Army $55 million
  •  Navy $34 million
  •  Air Force $24 million
  •  DARPA  >$240M

                                Margaret Kosal, Georgia Tech (5/12/11)

White House BRAIN INITIATIVE FY 2014 (soft side of neuroethics)

Examples of DOD Research Programs, 2016

  • Human, Social, Cultural, Behavioral MOdeling (HSCB)
  • Army Research Office, Life Science
  • Direct neural interfacing

The US Third Offset Strategy $18 Billion FY 2017

  • Wonky defense department strategist term
  • 1st offset is Atomic Bomb
  • 2nd offset was Guided Missiles (First gulf war)
  • 3rd offset a grab bag, term of convenience, computational neuroscience, what are they doing in general
  • E.g. robotics, systems autonomy, miniaturisation, big data, advanced manufacturing
  • Partner with innovative private sector companies
  • Manchurian Candidate (1962)

History of brain science loosely understood and counterintelligence

  • Sinatra bought copyright… now 1970s cult film
  • Rumours… American prisoners of war were brainwashed (South Florida journalist invented term)… hypnotised… one of them would be turned into assassin… and then VP candidate was Manchurian Candidate
    • Fairly new drug called LSD
    • hallucinogen
    • Stumbled on by chemist, in Barren, Switzerland, Albert Hoffman
    • Put it on shelf, and then he had visual hallucinations
      • 101 age passed away
      • POWs had made false confessions committing crimes against Korean

1953, experiments on LSD

  • Make a discrete man indiscrete
  • Sex, alcohol—old ways are best… get information from people
  • Worried about putting LSD into water supply
  • This is not new
  • LSD in trials
  • Cardinal Mindszenty (1949 trial) interrogated

DOD did LSD field studies

  • CIA infiltrated 17 area groups and gave out LSD

Operation Midnight Climax (two-way window)

  • Report to the President by the Commission on CIA Activities within the US
    • Hottest new tech to put into defense and offence

1950s big thing was hallucinogenics

  • Iconic drug from 1960s… but in 1950s was a national security

Operation Moneybags, 1964

  • Ebaumsworld.com
  • 25-50 min after the drug had taken effect; 1 person was taken away 20 min after
  • Using drug to modify behaviour to see if you can find some defences against it
  • UK… joint US – Canadian operation
  • Letter to Parliament from Secretary of State for Defence, 18 July 1995
  • Veterans were upset
  • Couldn’t have asked for consent because screwed up experimental design
  • Usually it is US get (FIA, second amendment, celebrities get excited about it)
  • Jennifer Lawrence to direct chemical warfare film
  • Neuroengineering with drugs, 1950s and 1960s

In Florida and California in 1970s…

  • Loose… sun, ocean, open lifestyle in Florida…
  • New culture developing
  • Let’s not do drugs… let’s find natural ways to live on beach and be hippies, and we can learn from war fighters… people talking to dolphins… we can learn how to be Buddhists and warrior monks…
  • Army picked it up in the 1980s…

1988 The Mind Race “Enhancing Human Performance”

Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance, The National Research Council, 1988

  • Warrior monks
  • ESP
  • Levitating and second healing and walking through walls
  • NRC advised them NOT to continue with this project
  • The men who stare at goats

Modafinil (Provigil)

  • supplement or replacement for amphetamines
  • Antisleep pill (approved to use in 2004 to airforce pilots)
  • 60-80 hours
  • Shiftworkers
  • Epilepsy…
  • Speed? But not exactly speed
  • Cognitive enhancers… decent meal and exercise…

The trust drug- oxytocin

  • Natural production is associated with trust behaviour
  • Cuddle drug…
  • May be artificially administered in a spray to encourage cooperation
  • Use in interrogations?
  • Claremont—gave oxytocin would be more cooperative and more trusing
    • See Paul Zak's experiment and TED talk
  • IN counter-intelligence could you do this with a suspect in a terrorist plot?
  • Violation of chemical weapons convention?
    • Lawyer—they fight for ISIS, ,they don’t fight under Geneva convention, just give it to them

The Anti-Conscience Pill—beta blockers, depressed … experiences but did not get happy or sad

  • In 1990s… give to people before warfighting/combat…
  • Hippocampus
  • Beta blockers can be used to treat stress, prevent PTSD
  • Surpress release of hormones like norephinephrine that help encode memory
  • Could they reduce guilt feelings?
  • Would we want something like this?
  • 1990 brain fingerprinter P300 (recognise a picture) true or false

o   FBI have watched some of these

  • Visualising memory

o   Episodic memory retrieval

  • A private company: 7-8 years how using certain device with some electrodes that they can restimulate your memory.. recall of words/events
  • Memory retrieval is harder than they thought- these are very distributed

o   Alan S. Cowen et al TMS

 2014, Neuroimage

  • Neural portraits
  • Functional MRI
  • Clip reconstructed from brain activity
  • Presented clip in MRI—then it can be reconstructed
  • Can you do this with dream images? Reconstruct dream images?
  • T. Horiwaka M Tamai, Science, April 4, 2013
  • Neural decoding of visual memory during sleep
  • In theory you want to watch your dreams…
  • Visual cortex… is big.. .back… a lot of stuff… cheating…
  • Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex

The Roborat

  • DARPA project
  • shadowlabs.org
  • tapping into the rat (whiskers—right and left)
  • it does have a choice… but if it does right thing, he gets pleasure centre hit to right or left
  • DARPA funded story… how the brain processes these signals
  • Seattle brain to brain interface, Doree Armstrong and Michelle like me…

TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation)

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
  • Replace shock therapy
  • B Zwissler—make you see something that you didn’t see
  • J of Neuroscience, neural modification
  • DIY tDCS

o   Transcranial experimentation

  • Beckman institute in Uni of Illinois
  • MIT undergraduate… TMS
  • An experiment in the neuroscience of ethics
  • That’s terrible… won’t let my girlfriend cross
  • After TMS… just asking if the girlfriend is ok

Optogenetics (Stanford)

  •  Neurons are genetically engineers to carry a protein adapted
  •  The very hungry mouse (chronically implanted on or off)… getting into hypocalmus
  •  What if you could link people’s brains together
  •  Talk to them without pointing, without using a radio
  •  Computing arm movements with a monkey brainet (linking brains together) at UniPenn
    • Arjun 2015 (with Duke Uni previously)
  • Fooling cognitive resources
  • Pooling electro-resources
  • Effective communications… movies better… or hook each  other up… like monkeys…juice…
  • Beyond better standard array (only in the lab it works, Brown University)
    • DARPA: briding the bio-electronic divide (100,000 microelectroarray)… quantum
  • Send signals intentionally
  • Korea… robosoldier… 10 years… in DMZ… heavily armed… make decisions on battle field…
  • Wall Street Journal…
  • Needs a “person in the loop”
  • Autonomous weapons already been used… moving to offensive world… autonomous lethal weapons…
  • Face recognition algorithm finally beats humans… by 1% machines are better…
  • UNOG Disarmament conventions

Ethical Challenges

  • Are the human experiment rules adequate?
  • How can we assess risks and benefits?

International Law

  • Human Rights
  • Humanitarian
  • Disarmament

New Ethical Principles?

NRC, 2008, 2009

  • Neuroscience for Army
  • Emerging and Readily available tech and national security
  • Framework for ethics

The Royal Society report on Neuroscience, National Security

Nuffield Bioethics…

Italy even joining

Q&A

  • Getting human cells… neural organoids into rat brains to see if they can get a smarter rat?
  • What about the AI world—IBM has a computer beating Go? Why are we not worried with IBM? Why is there NOT a committee?
  • Driverless cars? Insurance, risk question at the heart…
  • Computers cannot recognise INTENTION

Biggest issues are not consumers but national security

  • Wellcome Trust
  • The Dana Foundation
  • The Greenwall Foundation
  • History and Sociology of Science (Penn Arts and Sciences)
  • Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy
  • Rockefeller Brothers Fund
  • National Institute of Health

Richard L Wilson from Towson University delivers talks at BEC

Technical Problem:
    Big data is being introduced in the insurance industry which brings about increased regulations and restrictions regarding customer privacy
    Technological artefact, happens to be a watch. Uses it to self-medicate. And then they join a group on Facebook, and the individuals in the group self-medicate. There is no IRB board for recommendations they are making.

Ethical Question:
    Should insurance companies have access to the personal information, including health information, that is tracked on the wearable technology devices?

What is a wearable technology?
    A category of technology devices that can be worn by a consumer and often include tracking information related to health and fitness

Wearable Tech and Your Health
    Wearable tech are becoming increasingly popular
    Wearable tech can monitor live movements, heart rate, activity levels
    No estimates
    Can calculate risk
    2016: 275 million devices sold; 2017 have about 332 million

Wearable Tech and Accidents
    Wearable tech isn’t limited to things such as watches that record exercise habits
    Insurance is wearable cameras
    Cameras mounted on cars
    Cameras record events, accident scenes
    Good training tools
    More accurate accident reports

Health insurance companies
    Ethical egoism
    Rights based ethics
    Users concerned about lifelogging (family medical records) being accessed which could result in increases or decreases in premiums

Anticipatory: future- what is it going to look like?
Corporations making the devices
    Utilitarinism: if you do what we tell you we will increase happiness and reduce harm/sadness
    Surveillance capitalism
    Created as a way to track users
    User agreements are important
    3Billion in 5 hours… selling what you have given them!
    The info begins to the company, but data breaches and the changing landscape of the big data create new opportunities

Lawmakers and governments
    Rights-based ethics: within a persons right to refuse sensitive data to insurance companies
    HIPAA regulations, the rights of wearable users to refuse their health data to private and government insurance

Barriers to Overcome
    We need readjustment of ethical principles
    Can insurance companies use your data without permission
    Someone at work make you track yourself

Recommendations
    If not required by insurance companies have access to data on wearable technology, user should sign a consent form
    Universal healthcare- do not overcharge healthy people
    Government has responsibility to keep people healthy


Tele Surgery and Virtual Reality: Robotic Assisted Surgery Anticipating the Ethical Issues

What is an autonomous surgeon?
-    Robot capable of performing multiple surgical procedures without the need of constant human intervention
-    Uses feedback devices such as cameras, sensors etc

Recap
    Over 40K surgeries have been robot aided in the last year
    Programmed to minimise doctor’s intervention
    Most common is the da vinci
    Cost 1.7 million
Complex surgeries
    Not ready for human trials

Where the field can go
    Use teleoperated for operations overseas where doctors are unavailable
    Possible that surgical robots can replace surgeons altogether
    Program robots to perfom surgeries with no assistance
    Personalised surgery robots

Primary stakeholders
    Surgeons
    Patients
    Patients who have off site surgeries

Secondary
Technical Problems
    They are costly
    Some surgeries provide NO benefit for using the robots
    What is there is a disconnect mid surgery
    If autonomous and something goes wrong no doctor will be present to fix it
    Possibility for hacking/and or sabotage
In the Loop- human control
On the Loop- sight of human
Out of the Loop- no human involved

Technical Solutions
    Import cheaper parts
    Secondary power source
    Isolate robot from global networks
    Airgap the system

Social Problems
    Could conflict with beliefs
    Automatonophobic individuals
    Some Amish, memmonite etc
An option for the patient to choose whether or not an autonomous surgeon performs their surgery
Publish the trial testing and trial data to the public
E.g. dentist example


Ethical Problems
    Responsibility in the event of an undesirable outcome
    Non-sentient machines having control over human morality
    Alternative motives by programming (intentional harm or death)

Pre-establish legal liability prior to the start of the surgical process
Maintain human surgeon oversight
Require registration of robots and periodical assessments to ensure programming and function
 

Three talks: Wearable Systems and Insurance, Telerobotics and Surgery, and Implant Systems
Richard L. Wilson | Andres Pena

The Bioethics of Implantable Biohybrid Systems

Andres E Pena (rjung@fiu.edu), Ranu Jung

What are biohybrid systems?

                Biological systems

                Engineered systems

Life changing neuroprosthetic technologies

NeuroDesign

                Influence

                Access

                Promote Learning

                There are patterns of neural activity

Exogeneous systems

                Biomimetic

Endogenous systems

                Multiple scales

Therapeutic and Reparative Neurotechnology

Cochlear implants: success story

                Neuroprosthetic device. 300K users worldwide

Paving way for artificial limbs

                Control, and feel like these are their own

ANS – Neural enabled prosthetic hand system

                Restore sense of touch and proprioception

                Implant interface

                LIFEs longitudinal …

                LEAD system in upper arm

                Used to stimulate periphery nerves

Safety considerations

                Biocompatability

                Reliability

                Surgical procedures

                Cybersecurity

Designed for comparable . J. Neural Eng 2017

Seamless integration

                Ethics of hybridisation and potential impacts

                Sense of self

                Perception of reality

                Restoration vs enhancement

                Prosthesis embodiment

                Research trials

                Loss after failure

                Cost and coverage

                Access to maintenance

What’s ahead?

Future of implantable biohybrid systems

Closing the loop

Ventilatory assist

Electroceuticals

Visual neuroprostheses

BCI

Adaptive Neural Systems Lab

Some of them linked with materials (may not be able to guarantee neural function). The materials of the implants should last for lifetime of person. Regards of doing neuralstimulation, you don’t expect this problem… not electronics… but stimulation – how will last that for a lifetime.

SCIENCE FICTION on NETFLIX television series: Altered Carbon… chip on back of your neck to live forever… take chip out and put back… based on a book with the same title written by Richard K. Morgan

* The graphics from Altered Carbon are placed here in so far as the television series was mentioned by the presenter, simply as futuristic visions.

Reuse of cardiac pacemakers in 3rd world countries… ethical issues…

                Inline connector designs

For now just hoping to get sensation back to upper arm for those who have lost it, so they feel that their hand or their prosthetic is actually a part of their body. Using same approach as cochlear implant but for upper arm.

ANS Team at FIU Rocks

The Adaptive Neural Systems Laboratory team headed by Dr Ranu Jung is an exceptional team with a young dynamic group. Looking at the biographies of this team, quite a few of the researchers, including Dr Jung had long standing careers at ASU. Their work is truly inspiring and groundbreaking, and students/ grad students/ and staff have a deep awareness of ethical issues. It is exciting to meet teams like this at conferences who take philosophy and ethics so seriously.

Navigating Ethics in a STEM Training Grant – El Paso

Building scholars for the future of biomedical research

Responsible conduct in research

Identifying an impact

Signs of a sound scientist

Goal: Train biomedical researchers through a multi-institution consortium

Partner Schools: ASU, Baylor, Clemson etc

BUILD students

                96 students (60 Female, 36 male)

Responsible conduct in research

                Dangers of Research Fraud

                                Trimming

                                Cooking

                                Forging

Goal: provide an experience of research ethics… students take ownership of their research

Active Learning

                Participation and activities other than watching, listening and taking notes

Scale Up Space

                Students sit in a circle within their groups

                Remove barriers

Importance

                Sudden introduction into scientific research realm

                Bootcamp for incoming freshmen—3 weeks course in Summer

                What is ethics? What is values? What are your values? Why are they important?

                                Scenarios, situations, put themselves in position of principal investigator

                                                How do I feel about it/

Boot camp, research foundations course, research development course

Assessment

                Take the CITI module – Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative

                Based on RFC Completion

                Guage impact of course on students

                Pre/post test

Analysis

                Methods practising are impactful both for students who are doing the courses as BUILDScholars and those who are doing it as “affiliates”.

                Similar outcomes for 2015, 2016

Building Student Identity

                BuildScholars have bootcamp and CITI training

                Identified only first semester… is the impact same over time?

                Students are more active in identifying potential for research misconduct

                Have confidence to bring up to superiors

Q&A

                “We just want to do research why do we have to do ethics training?”

                NIH Video called “Lab” – Dynamic situation… if not following method then there are issues

                                Biomedical research intro

                                https://ori.hhs.gov/thelab

                Safety training, blood/pathogen, misuse of laboratory equipment

Computer Programming Literacy for Medical Professionals

Teshaun J Francis

Should doctors and nurses learn to code?

Jeff Atwood: “Please Don’t Learn to Code” because of specialisation

Programming literacy should be a requirement but not learning to program

Should medical professionals learn to code?

Computer code is a tool to solve problems

Renovation example:

                Organisational tool. Neuromind.cc

                Pieter Kubben

                Programmingforphysicians.com

                TED Talk: clinical decision supporting systems

                Data input, manipulation, data output

How technology is being used to teach medical students?

                Virtual skeleton

                Next generation quiz cards

                Not a replacement for cadavers… but there to supplement

                Microsoft HoloLens teaching anatomy

                                IBM Watson Health

                                “You want doctor’s to teach anatomy”? Not IBM unless they utilised doctor’s to do this

                IBM Watson is an attempt to doing diagnostic role of a doctor

                                Double-blind studies

                                                75-98% agreement with a doctor

                                                It is a tool… not a doctor…

                                Ibm.com/Watson/health

                                                Watson agrees with physicians…

Teaching Ethics in an Advanced Education in General Residency Program: general dentists UCSF

                AEGD. After 4 years of dental school can specialise or go to practice, or do 1 year of clinical training of research

                Teaching ethics to dental students is really difficult, disengaged of residents, irrelevant etc.

                Dental students getting trained from ethics is decreasing in hours…

                Basic training but in postgrad, it is little. The framework is absent.

                Residents presented cases every week based on personal experiences while they were in residence!

                Mean number of contact hours of ethics instruction is around 26.5 hours- undergrad

                In postgraduate only about 15 hours

                                “Ethics is important, but our curriculum is already crowded and there is no room for ethics teaching”

                                “observing how seniors do it”

                                “learnt at home with family, not at school”

What is ethics?

                “when in doubt it is probably not ethical”

Five fundamental principles

                Patient autonomy: informed consent, what is treatment, risk, benefits, costs, alternatives in layman’s terms

                Nonmalficence: do no harm

                Beneficence: to do good, patients get treated in time

                Justice: duty to provide dental care no matter who it is

                Veracity: dentist-patient relationship based on trust and truthfulness

·         About 36% of schools ONLY teach this

What happens when a patient comes in and has issues with sensitivity in front teeth… teeth issues, decay, cannot pay… anxiety as victim of domestic violence… temporary crown… and then dismiss… what do you do?

                “Termination of Care”: cannot terminate midway; cannot withhold records

                Resolultion: new resident will complete front 6 teeth, and do not take on new responsibility unless she pays up. Need to be stable. Provided care. Did not do harm.

                Began Jan 2017 to Dec 2017.

                Personal clinical cases: 11 residents, plus students, academics and risk management office

Conclusion

                Vertically integrated ethics curriculum is being proposed

                Ethical reasoning

                Common ethical challenges

                Opportunity to discuss ethical dilemmas “on the fly”

                Available resource consultations

                Practice management implications

                Designing a case based didactic program

Goals of care

                Understanding informed refusal

                California Ethics Law

                Informed consent and presumed consent—did they sign?

                                I was lying down and vulnerable at mercy of a dentist—lawyers get in

Truth is that students are serious about the clinical training—they are in the field. Do they block the Friday morning from residency, where the whole day could be used for integrated learning.

Increase from 26 to 100 hours on ethics…

Research Ethics Training for Rising Researchers – Eman Ghanem, Sigma Xi

Research misconduct

Data management The responsible handling of data

Staying professional: collaboration, mentorship, authorship

Disclosing details: confidentiality and conflict of interest

Respecting research subjects: bioethics crash course

Staying cool: understanding research pressures and consequences

Research Ethics Jeopardy

·         Modules were 30 minutes each

·         Activities: Case study, discussions, Game: around the lab, ethical or unethical

Necessity of Animal Research Ethics

Humane treatment is essential in research

Reduction (# of animals), Refinement (improve techniques for harm/stress), Replacement (simulation, computational models)

                Involve other collaborations- like vet courses, to destroy less animals

                Idea development, protocol development, grant app, review, experimentation, data analysis, result interpretation

                Greatest contribution when anatomy and physiology is similar to human

How to establish link?

                Communication programs

                Incentives

                Research Experience

                Animal suffering and distress can be reduced by collaboration

Data Ethics and Computational Bioscience

Kenneth W. Goodman (Miami University)

https://ethics.miami.edu/about/people/faculty/main-faculty/kenneth-w-goodman/index.html

Many sources of data collection and sharing that are morally obligatory

Population health science has always been

                Information-intensive

                Able to presume the consent of its beneficiaries

                Utilitarian

Technology, scientific advances, beliefs about how the world is?

Let’s try that?

History of pharmacology

                Raising questions for applied prescriptions in x or y

Blood letting questions?

We try to organise this through scientific theory

                Blood, phlegm, Red, green

                George Washington was famously killed by his surgeons who over-blood letting

                                Surgeons over physicians…

                               If you don’t know what is going on inside DO NOT cut it out.

                                Film called THE PHYSICIAN with Ben Kingsely

                Organ transplantation, autopsy, necromancy, mutilation

                What is the role of religion?

What about keeping dying people alive for a transplant…

Destination therapy and not “bridges”

                Is that an appropriate use of a technology?

                Resuscitate every dying patient?

End of life care

                Probability of futility AND amount of suffering the child would undergo

                Dying with more suffering…

                Texas Advanced Corrective Act

                Cleveland Clinic Institution—but not in Florida… it is too weird here…

Broader application of data

                Precision medicine, personalised medicine, ekmo, ASV devices, end of life, duty of care etc

                If you just use population health to help people it would be major to save many people in the globe with CLEAN DRINKING WATER

                “Is it selfishness? Not love…”

                Secondary gain: “if she dies, the social security $ will stop”

                Population health—need more information

               (Paracelsus)… pattern in the data… respiratory illness when they were in mines… correlation

                John Snow… dot on a map… data collection without consent…  did he stop the epidemic?

                                Removed the pump… gun show epidemiology

                                Information intensive

Epidemiology in the era of big data. Epidemiology 2015

                More human lives will be touched by technology than anything else…

Privacy vs science

                Privacy and confidentiality were never seriously considered to be hard barriers to sharing and analysis

                                Reductio issue (left toe example)… can you help others with same problem?

                Biomedical research has long relied on the work of trusted entities to collect health information

                Security, de-identification, anonymization, pseudonymisation

Vague Nomenclature

                Cloud is a metaphor

                Data is used sloppily—knowledge, information etc

Big data

                Ethical concerns should focus on decision support- given variable data and database quality, uncertainty

                Appropriate user and users

                Data sharing and interoperability

5mb computer in 1956 pic.

Privacy

                Is not an absolute right

                Must therefore be balanced again other right, including a right to benefit from science

Information Free-Riders

                Emphasise rights…

Analogues

                Vaccine refusers

                Organ donation

                Infrastructure support refusers

Health and privacy

                Smart laws and policies

                Recognition of duties to collectives

                Learning healthcare systems

                Public health analogue “duty to treat”

                Trust

Role of Ethics

                Illuminate the force, scope and limitation of rights

                Identify and balance conflicting rights, and rights and duties

                Identify and justify duties

Precedents

Management and governance

                Balance health, data, privacy

                Identify best practices

                Develop revised IR-like review entities

                Consultation capacity for risk communications, decisions under uncertainty

                Agreement and civil society

DNA, epigenome, life going through illness, and exposure to all thinigs in world…

Social determinants of disease…

Scandanavia—clinical care/ research? Health insurance provision?

                Health care provided for everyone? They affect the health of populations. Buy insurance?

                https://www.cdc.gov/

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6176/1203

https://ethics.miami.edu/about/people/faculty/main-faculty/kenneth-w-goodman/index.html

Understanding cases within profession (Wade Robinson)

Edward Tufte’s compelling mistaken reading of what went wrong with the Challenger.

https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/

https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_vdqi

Challenger ‘O-rings’ safety in the Challenger: the astronauts were killed by impact not by explosion

Tufte blamed the engineers- if they had done a scatterplot they could have worked it out

                You can see increasing risk of damage

                The ascending curve of risk

                If proper scatterplot done, no one would have risked to launch the Challenger in such cold weather

                “They didn’t know what they were doing, but they were doing a lot of it”

Big thing is that NASA launched BELOW 50 C at 40C.

Research Misconduct in FDA Regulated Clinical Trials: What Not to Do

What is research misconduct?

                The falsification of data or results or recording and reporting

                Deviation from established protocol- data doesn’t reflect what you were studying

                Violation of human subjects and rights

                Plagiarism

How did definition happen?

                Third Reich

                Nuremburg Code

                World Med Assoc Declaration of Helsinki

                Tuskugee Syphilis study and Belmont Report

US Government Oversight

                DHHS (office of human research protection)

                USFDA

How did FDA get authority?

                Thalidomide incident in 1950s (Francis Kelsey)

                1962 Amendments (Kefauver-Harris Amendment)

What does FDA do to ensure research misconduct does not occur?

                Inspection/audit

                                Ethical standards

                                Regulatory requirements

What is FDA looking for in regards to ethical standards and regulatory requirements

                IRB approval

                Informed consent

                Required reports by IRB

FDA Research Observations

                FDA investigators cite observed deviations from regulatory requirements

What happens after observations are reported?

                Observations by FDA investigators are passed through multiple levels of review before a final classification

FDA Clinical Investigator Action

                Warning letter and nidpoe

                Get in trouble—this is big issue

                Only usa

University of Pennsylvania Gene Therapy Trial

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Gelsinger

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC81135/

                Objective: treatment for OTC deficiency

                                Prevents proper elimination of ammonia

                Death in the trial within 96 hours

                1999 Nov. 1.5 month Clinical Investigator James Wilson

Letter highlights

                Based on all the citations that happen

                Did not follow protocol

                Should have STOPPED clinical trial… 5 increases of therapy before subject died in cohort 6!

                They did not tell the patient ALL the information.

University College London Medical Device Implantations

                https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/oct/01/guinea-pigs-experimental-implants-used-despite-no-approval-for-human-use

                Situation

                In humans

                Strict regulatory oversight—safe for humans

                No IRB

                Results: Deaths of guinea pig subjects

                                Termination of researchers employment

                                Regulatory and criminal investigations

Bial-Portela Clinical Trial

                https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkroll/2016/01/17/patient-dies-in-phase-i-trial-of-bials-drug-in-france/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/

                The investigators didn’t do anything wrong, this was just a poorly designed trial

                Cohorts were overlapping

                Higher concentration

                                Real time data wasn’t coming in and subject died, and others ended up with brain lesions

Conclusions

                Regulations

                                Clinical investigators

                                Laboratories

                                Irbs

                                Sponsors

                                Sponsor-investigations

                Written to prevent issues that have previously occurred

                                Human subject rights protection

                                Assurance of data validity

                Inspections and Audits (FDA, OHRP)

                Ramifications

                                Death

                                License removed

Dr Sheldon Krimsky

                http://emerald.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/

                Monsanto Litigation Documents

                Integrity of Research journals

                Crisis in Credibility

                Sheldon.krimsky@tufts.edu

                Contested issue between science and commerce

                                Can it affect public health

                Corporations have a different view of science- one of many inputs to production

                Science just one of inputs into production function …. Lead, asbestos, BPA, tobacco (lobby against)

                IARC, WHO Report 2000

                DSM-IV: panel members had conflicted interest when they produced categories

                100% panel on mood disorders, schizophrenia etc.

                “On the Take”

                                Jerome Kaiser

                Conflict of interest and scientific journals

                Can you believe what you read

                                Funding effect in science

The Monsanto Litigation

                Specialised cancer research arm of the WHO, reached a determination chemical glyphosate-based herbiside

                More than 270 of the cases have been consolidated multi-district litigation for oversight by 1 judge in the US District court of San Francisco

                3,500 plaintiffs

                Multi district litigation

Monsanto’s Web site on Glyphosate—does not have adverse effects to humans, wildlife and environment (hodgkins lymphoma IHL)

                Rightoknow web site

Corporate behaviour

                Ghost writing: that is how they do business. EPA referenced. Determination 2016, glyphosate was not likely carcinogenic

                                They hired Intertek Scientific & Regulatory Consultancy

                Undo influence of regulatory agencies

                Undo scientific journals…

                                Unethical to ghost write journals!

                                                It was published by Toxicology articles

                                                William Heydens… disclosed this

                  Editor in chief got money for this from Monsanto!

                   JFCT- retract or remove the journal… paper retracted after 1 year

                    “results were not definitive”… paper retracted but as soon as it was another journal published the article

                Who should a journal editor review—an employee of Monsanto review a paper about Monsanto

                When vital public health reports are published in refereed journals there is a heightened expectation that they meet professional standards of scientific integrity. Those standards include full disclosure of conflicts of interests…. Sources of funding….

                The Lancet--- 3 positive reviews, and one so-so… “not a priority to publish”

Ethical Guidelines for Authorship- Subrata Saha

                Gift authorship; ghost writing

                Millikan Oil Drop Experiment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMfYHag7Liw

                                Fletcher and Millikan share but each sole authorship

                The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

                                Henry R Cowell 1998 wrote an editorial

                                Inform patient care

                                Goal should not be to add to CV but to help

                                                Ideas should be new

                                                Don’t waste space, for redundant data… should be consolidated, not salami?

                                                Prior to the experiments

                                Informed consent, clinical aspects, cost, statistical method, begun BEFORE we begin

                                Manuscript written with same patient care in mind than before

                Benefits

                                Career advancement, get grants

                                Networking

                                Rights to copyright

                                                Pressure to publish first

                                Who was first? Discovery

                                Tenure and professional standing

Problems

                Who should be an author?

                                Advisor and graduated students…

                                Now many groups collaborate, in group and within nation

                                All work builds on multiple achievements

                Expectation: author wrote it; author did work that was written down; always real data; and results and claims should be accurate; author should disclose bias or potential for COI.

                Contributions—interpretation, acquisition of data, drafting, critical, final submission, author should know about it and carefully review it

                                Take responsibility

                                Financial disclosure form

                                Should not be allowed to publish

Who is not the author?

                                Just because someone got funding but played NO role in design or rationality of study then should not be author

                                General responsibility for lab—not enough for author

                                Just because they have the data—not enough for author

Other authorship issues

                Redundant information

                Duplicate papers

Still a problem: divvy up work, order of authorship, etc Avoid conflict by meeting from outset and publishing paper.

What are external regulations?

                Self-plagiarism—is this plagiarism?

                Hire agreements

Biomedical Device Risks and Non-Medical Implantable Risks by Katina Michael

Slides available here.

Audio of my presentation here.

Risks associated with microchipping people for medical and non-medical applications
Katina Michael
Previous
Previous

Brain Implant Electromagnetic Issues

Next
Next

Magic Kingdom's MagicBand: Hocus Pocus in DisneyWorld